PROFESSIONAL RELIABLE JN0-664 EXAM TIPS COVERS THE ENTIRE SYLLABUS OF JN0-664

Professional Reliable JN0-664 Exam Tips Covers the Entire Syllabus of JN0-664

Professional Reliable JN0-664 Exam Tips Covers the Entire Syllabus of JN0-664

Blog Article

Tags: Reliable JN0-664 Exam Tips, Exam JN0-664 Preparation, Exam JN0-664 Certification Cost, Latest JN0-664 Exam Experience, JN0-664 Latest Exam Registration

The second format FreePdfDump also has a product support team available every time to help you out in any terms. And they will fix all of your problems on time. provides its users to study for Prepare for your Service Provider, Professional (JNCIP-SP) (JN0-664) exam is web-based practice exam. This format has all the features of desktop practice exam software for Juniper JN0-664 exam preparation.

Juniper JN0-664: Service Provider, Professional (JNCIP-SP) exam is an excellent certification for professionals who want to enhance their skills and knowledge in the field of service provider technologies. Service Provider, Professional (JNCIP-SP) certification is a proof of the skills and knowledge that a candidate possesses in configuring and troubleshooting service provider routing technologies and implementing service provider VPN solutions. Service Provider, Professional (JNCIP-SP) certification is recognized by many service providers around the world, and it is a valuable credential for those who are looking to advance their careers in the service provider industry.

Achieving the Juniper JN0-664 Certification demonstrates a high level of expertise in service provider network design, implementation, and management. Service Provider, Professional (JNCIP-SP) certification is recognized globally as a mark of excellence in the networking industry and can open up new career opportunities for professionals looking to advance their careers in service provider networks. With the growing demand for network professionals who can design, implement, and manage service provider networks, the Juniper JN0-664 certification is a valuable asset for any networking professional looking to enhance their skills and knowledge.

>> Reliable JN0-664 Exam Tips <<

Free Download Reliable JN0-664 Exam Tips & Trustable Exam JN0-664 Preparation Ensure You a High Passing Rate

We learned that a majority of the candidates for the exam are office workers or students who are occupied with a lot of things, and do not have plenty of time to prepare for the JN0-664 exam. So we have tried to improve the quality of our training materials for all our worth. Now, I am proud to tell you that our training materials are definitely the best choice for those who have been yearning for success but without enough time to put into it. There are only key points in our JN0-664 Training Materials. That is to say, you can pass the JN0-664 exam as well as getting the related certification only with the minimum of time and efforts under the guidance of our training materials.

The JNCIP-SP certification is a valuable credential for those who are looking to advance their careers in the service provider industry. Service Provider, Professional (JNCIP-SP) certification validates the skills and knowledge required to configure and troubleshoot complex networks, and it is recognized by many service providers around the world.

Juniper Service Provider, Professional (JNCIP-SP) Sample Questions (Q72-Q77):

NEW QUESTION # 72
Exhibit

Referring to the exhibit, PIM-SM is configured on all routers, and Anycast-RP with Anycast-PIM is used for the discovery mechanism on RP1 and RP2. The interface metric values are shown for the OSPF area.
In this scenario, which two statements are correct about which RP is used? (Choose two.)

  • A. Source2 will use RP1 and Receiver2 will use RP1 for group 224.2.2.2.
  • B. Source1 will use RP1 and Receiver1 will use RP1 for group 224.1.1.1.
  • C. Source2 will use RP2 and Received will use RP2 for group 224.2.2.2.
  • D. Source1 will use RP1 and Receiver1 will use RP2 for group 224.1 1 1

Answer: B,C

Explanation:
A sham link is a logical link between two PE routers that belong to the same OSPF area but are connected through an L3VPN. A sham link makes the PE routers appear as if they are directly connected, and prevents OSPF from preferring an intra-area back door link over the VPN backbone. A sham link creates an OSPF multihop neighborship between the PE routers using TCP port 646. The PEs exchange Type 1 OSPF LSAs instead of Type 3 OSPF LSAs for the L3VPN routes, which allows OSPF to use the correct metric for route selection1.


NEW QUESTION # 73
Exhibit

Referring to the exhibit, a working L3VPN exists that connects VPN-A sites CoS is configured correctly to match on the MPLS EXP bits of the LSP, but when traffic is sent from Site-1 to Site-2, PE-2 is not classifying the traffic correctly What should you do to solve the problem?

  • A. Configure the explicit-null statement on PE-1.
  • B. Configure VPN prefix mapping for the PE-1_to_PE-2 LSP
  • C. Configure the explicit-null statement on PE-2
  • D. Set a static CoS value for the PE-1_to_PE-2 LSP

Answer: A

Explanation:
Explanation
The explicit-null statement enables the PE router to send an MPLS label with a value of 0 (explicit null) instead of an IP header for packets destined to the VPN customer sites. This allows the penultimate hop router (the router before the egress PE router) to preserve the EXP bits of the MPLS label and pass them to the egress PE router. The egress PE router can then use these EXP bits to classify the traffic according to the CoS policy2
. In this example, PE-1 should configure the explicit-null statement under [edit protocols mpls label-switched-path PE-1_to_PE-2] hierarchy level.


NEW QUESTION # 74
Which two statements are correct about VPLS tunnels? (Choose two.)

  • A. LDP-signaled VPLS tunnels use auto-discovery to provision sites
  • B. BGP-signaled VPLS tunnels require manual provisioning of sites.
  • C. LDP-signaled VPLS tunnels only support control bit 0.
  • D. BGP-signaled VPLS tunnels can use either RSVP or LDP between the PE routers.

Answer: C,D

Explanation:
https://www.juniper.net/documentation/us/en/software/nce/feature-guide-virtual-private-lan-service/topics/task/vpls-ldp-signaling-solutions.html
https://www.juniper.net/documentation/us/en/software/junos/vpn-l2/topics/concept/vpns-configuring-vpls-routing-instances.html#id-11510150__id-11568648


NEW QUESTION # 75
Exhibit

You are troubleshooting the connection between AS 64496 and AS 64497 and notice that only one of the paths is being used for traffic forwarding.
Referring to the exhibit, which three actions will ensure that R1 is configured properly for load balancing BGP routes? (Choose three.)

  • A. Verify that the routing table on R1 has BGP routes for 203.0.113.128/25 with multiple next hops.
  • B. Verify that the multipath option is configured under protocols bgp on both R2 and R3.
  • C. Verify that there is a load balancing export policy under routing-options for the received BGP routes on R1.
  • D. Verify that an import load balancing policy exists under protocols bgp for the received BGP routes on R1.
  • E. Verify that the multipath option is configured under protocols bgp on R1.

Answer: A,C,E

Explanation:
https://www.juniper.net/documentation/us/en/software/junos/bgp/topics/topic-map/load-balancing-bgp-session.html


NEW QUESTION # 76
Exhibit.

Referring to the exhibit; the 10.0.0.0/24 EBGP route is received on R5; however, the route is being hidden.
What are two solutions that will solve this problem? (Choose two.)

  • A. On R4, create a policy to change the BGP next hop to itself and apply it to IBGP as an export policy
  • B. On R4, create a policy to change the BGP next hop to 172.16.1.1 and apply it to IBGP as an export policy
  • C. Add the internal interface prefix to the BGP routing tables.
  • D. Add the external interface prefix to the IGP routing tables

Answer: A,D

Explanation:
Explanation
the default behavior for iBGP is to propagate EBGP-learned prefixes without changing the next-hop. This can cause issues if the next-hop is not reachable via the IGP. One solution is to use the next-hop self command on R4, which will change the next-hop attribute to its own loopback address. This way, R5 can reach the next-hop via the IGP and install the route in its routing table.
Another solution is to add the external interface prefix (120.0.4.16/30) to the IGP routing tables of R4 and R5.
This will also make the next-hop reachable via the IGP and allow R5 to use the route. According to 2, this is a possible workaround for a pure IP network, but it may not work well for an MPLS network.


NEW QUESTION # 77
......

Exam JN0-664 Preparation: https://www.freepdfdump.top/JN0-664-valid-torrent.html

Report this page